| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | Under Article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development
Procedure) Order 1995 (SI No.1995/419) the Secretary of State for
Transport has directed that permission be refused because the proposed
development includes the creation of a new vehicular access to the A47
trunk road and insufficient details have been provided to enable the
development's effect on the trunk road to be established,with regards to
both safety and the function of that trunk road as part of the national
systemfor through traffic in accordance with Section 10 of the Highways
Act 1980. |
| 2. | The proposed new roundabout giving access from the A47 trunk road is not
included within the application site and no evidence has been submitted
to describe the traffic impact of such a proposal nor to expand upon the
mechanism for funding such a scheme which would have a direct impact
upon the County Council's own proposals. |
| 3. | Policy TCM35 of the Great Yarmouth Borough-Wide Local Plan Deposit
Version states that the Borough Council will not permit any proposal
to develop the former Vauxhall carriage sidings, Acle New Road, or the
former Amoco pipe yard adjacent to the A47 Western Bypass for uses other
than a rail-related development scheme.Any change of use which could
prejudice the future use of the land for rail freight or rail-related
purposes will also be refused.The proposed development is contrary to
this policy and prejudicial to the Council's aim to promote the
development of the rail sidings for freight traffic in conjunction with
the development of the port and the proposed Outer Harbour. |
| 4. | The proposal is contrary to policies CS.1, CS.11, EC.1 and T.1 of the
Approved Norfolk Structure Plan (1993) and to policies CS.1, T.1 and
T.5 as contained in the Draft Norfolk Structure Plan (1997) and thereby
prejudicial to the strategic planning objectives of the Plans.
Continued on next page. |
| 5. | Because of the close proximity of the application site to the Breydon
Water SSSI,LNR, SPA and Ramsar site it is considered that the development
and use of the site could have a detrimental effect on the natural
environment of the most sensitive part of the estuary and that consent
should not be granted in the absence of an environmental assessment
required under Regulation 48 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats,& c.)
Regulations 1994. |
| 6. | The site is identified as a Potential Rail Aggregate Depot in the
Norfolk Minerals Local Plan policy MIN 22 of which states that the
County Council will seek to safeguard potential rail head aggregate depot
sites as shown on the Proposals Maps against alternative development
proposals.The proposal is therefore contrary to this policy and thereby
prejudicial to the objectives of the Plan. |
