| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposal is contrary to the provisions of Policy H.4 of the Norfolk
Structure Plan and Policy HOU6 of the Deposit Version of the Borough-Wide
Local Plan (as amended by the "Suggested Changes") in that the details as
submitted would be significantly detrimental to the form, character and
setting of the village, and would not afford suitable access arrangements. |
| 2. | The proposal is contrary to the provisions of Policy BE.1 of the Norfolk
Structure Plan and Policy BNV7 of the Deposit Version of the Borough-Wide
Local Plan (as amended by the "Suggested Changes") in that the details as
submitted, particularly in terms of siting, form and detailed design,
would be unsympathetic to the character of the Conservation Area in which
the site is located. |
| 3. | The proposal does not meet the requirements of Policy REC9 of the Deposit
Version of the Borough-Wide Local Plan (as amended by the "Suggested
Changes") in that no provision has been made for open recreational amenity
space and children's play space. |
| 4. | The proposed site access has sub-standard levels of visibility in both
directions and is unsuitable to cater for the traffic movements proposed.
The indicated visibility arrangements fail to comply with the requirements
of Department of Transport Planning Policy Guidance Note No. 13. |
| 5. | The additional traffic movements this proposal will generate in close
proximity to the adjacent road junction will be detrimental to road safety
and the free movement of other highway users. |
| 6. | The position of the site access will create vehicular conflict with the
access of the garage premises opposite.
continued on next page:- |
