| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | No substantive marketing evidence has been provided to demonstrate that the change of use is commercially justified, insofar as the site being marketed at an appropriate price for at least 18 months. Evidence suggests that the employment site is performing well, with a high ratio of employment uses to vacant or non-employment units and there is a need to formally market the site to allow for potential employment uses to occupy the units. There is therefore no evidence to indicate that the employment use of the unit is not sequentially viable contrary to adopted Core Strategy (2015) Policy CS6. |
| 2. | The proposal would not create a satisfactory relationship between the proposed use and pre-existing uses without significant detriment to the continuation and amenity of existing and proposed uses, as required by Core Strategy Policy CS6. The proposal would introduce a noise-sensitive use in close proximity to a noise generating use immediately adjacent to the site boundary, and may prejudice the ability of future noise-generating uses to operate in proximity to the dog day care centre, contrary to adopted Core Strategy Policy (2015) CS6 and CS9, adopted Local Plan Part 2 (2021) Policy 1, and the expectations of the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 3. | A Noise Impact Assessment, carried out by a suitably qualified professional, has not been submitted to accompany the application, which is required for any application where noise-sensitive uses are proposed in close proximity to noise generating uses, or where an application is noise generating. There is therefore potential for excessive and unreasonable effects on the amenity of occupiers of existing and proposed development contrary to adopted Core Strategy (2015) Policy CS9 and adopted Local Plan Part 2 (2021) Policy A1. |
