| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The majority of the application site is located outside the village development limits and seeks the erection of two dwellings, a net increase of one over the extant permission; consequently, the application is contrary to saved policy HOU07 from the Borough-Wide Local Plan and Core Policy CS02 (a) from the adopted Core Strategy. Justification has not been given that the proposal should be assessed against saved policy HOU10 from the Borough-Wide Local Plan and furthermore it does not meet the criteria required. |
| 2. | It has not been demonstrated that a footpath could be provided to link the application site with the village proper. This would therefore increase the likelihood of journeys being made using the private motor car, contrary to paragraph 8 of the NPPF and Core Policy CS01 (e) which seeks to provide accessible places that promote healthy lifestyles and provide easy access for everyone to jobs, shops and community facilities by walking, cycling and public transport. |
| 3. | The introduction of an additional dwelling on the site would increase the density of the development resulting in the over-development of the site. This is contrary to HOU17 and CS09 A which seeks to ensure that development respects the character and form of the surrounding built environment. |
| 4. | STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT (REFUSALS): In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above. |
