| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The application site is located outside the village development limits and seeks the erection of one dwelling; consequently, the application is contrary to saved policy HOU10 from the Borough-Wide Local Plan. The site has a lack of safe pedestrian access to local amenities and therefore it is considered that there would be a reliance on the private car for future occupants of the proposed development. As such it would be contrary to core policy CS1 (e) from the adopted Core Strategy, which seeks to ensure that new developments provide easy access for everyone to jobs, shops and community facilities by walking, cycling and public transport. Furthermore, it is considered that the application would not comply with core policy CS02 from the adopted Core Strategy which seeks to balance the delivery of new homes with the creation of self-contained communities and reducing the need to travel. |
| 2. | The additional size, height and additional gables of the proposal would restrict views of the Manor House Grade II Listed Building and would harm its setting. Therefore the application is considered to be contrary to Paragraph 194 of the National Planning Policy Framework and Core Policy CS10 from the adopted Core Strategy which both seek to ensure that the significance of the Borough's historics assets and their settings are maintained or enhanced. |
| 3. | STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT (REFUSALS): In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above. |
