| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The application site is located outside the village development limits and with the lack of safe pedestrian access to local amenities it is considered that there would be a reliance on the private car for future occupants of the proposed development. As such it would be contrary to core policy CS1 (e) from the adopted Core Strategy, which seeks to ensure that new developments provide easy access for
everyone to jobs, shops and community facilities by walking, cycling and public transport. Furthermore, it is considered that the application would not comply with core policy CS02 from the adopted Core Strategy which seeks to balance the delivery of new homes with the creation of self-contained communities and reducing the need to travel. |
| 2. | The proposed dwelling is considered to be out of keeping with the character of the area by virtue of its scale, form and design. Therefore, it is considered that the application is contrary to core policy CS1 (a) from the adopted Core Strategy which seeks to ensure that development is in a location that complements the character and supports the function of individual settlements and core policy CS09 a from the adopted Core Strategy which aims to ensure that new developments draw inspiration from the surrounding area's distinctive natural, built and historic characteristics, such as scale, form, massing and materials. |
| 3. | STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT (REFUSALS): In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above. |
