| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | Insufficient information has been provided in relation to water-voles - a protected species - and the final discharge points of the drainage ditch to be used for the disposal of foul and surface water, and therefore the Local Planning Authority as the competent authority, is unable to make the appropriate assessment of its impact of the development proposal on protected species and Natura2000 habitat and therefore the Local Planning Authority could not meet its statutory duty as required by The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, Circular 06/2005, the National Planning Policy Framework, and conflicts with the provisions of Adopted Core Strategy 2015 - Policy CS11. |
| 2. | Whilst the general principle of a modest housing development in a Tertiary village is acceptable in policy terms, the proposal does not represent an acceptable infill within the obvious development limits of the settlement, and would constitute an unacceptable form of tandem-backland development that would appear out-of-character with the linear form of the settlement, contrary to the N.P.P.F and conflicts with the provisions of Adopted Core Strategy 2015 - Policy CS2. |
| 3. | The dwelling constitutes an alien encroachment in to the attractive countryside to the north of the settlement, and adjoining the Broads Authority Executive Area, which is to be afforded the highest level of protection. The proposed dwelling would appear out-of-place within the open rural landscape. The impact on the landscape is exacerbated by the scale and design of the dwelling, which is inappropriate for the location and would be harmful to the rural character, and as a result, it fails to take the opportunity to improve the character and quality of the area as required by paragraph 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework and conflicts with the provisions of Core Strategy Policy CS9. |
