Great Yarmouth Borough Council

No.	Condition Text
1.	The applicant has failed to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development and substantial benefits are necessary and outweigh the harm to the listed building dwelling, its settings, fabric and important historic features (gutter, gutter brackets) therefore, the proposed development would be contrary to Policies CS09 and CS10 from the adopted Core Strategy, The NPPF ( paragraphs 194 a and 195) paragraphs 184 and 192 a) and The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (Section 72).
2.	STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT: In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above.

No.

Condition Text

The applicant has failed to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development and substantial benefits are necessary and outweigh the harm to the listed building dwelling, its settings, fabric and important historic features (gutter, gutter brackets) therefore, the proposed development would be contrary to Policies CS09 and CS10 from the adopted Core Strategy, The NPPF ( paragraphs 194 a and 195) paragraphs 184 and 192 a) and The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (Section 72).

STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT: In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above.