Great Yarmouth Borough Council

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed development would result in an internal layout which due to its lack of a bedroom window and its location next to a bin store would be inharmonious with the permitted formal ground floor layout of the building and therefore would be in conflict with saved Policies HOU07 of the Great Yarmouth Borough-wide Local Plan (2001) (LP) and Policy CS9 of the Great Yarmouth Local Plan: Core Strategy (2015) (CS) which seek to ensure good design and that new development is not detrimental to the character of an area. The proposal is also in conflict with the good design aims of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework).
2.	STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT (REFUSALS): In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed development would result in an internal layout which due to its lack of a bedroom window and its location next to a bin store would be inharmonious with the permitted formal ground floor layout of the building and therefore would be in conflict with saved Policies HOU07 of the Great Yarmouth Borough-wide Local Plan (2001) (LP) and Policy CS9 of the Great Yarmouth Local Plan: Core Strategy (2015) (CS) which seek to ensure good design and that new development is not detrimental to the character of an area. The proposal is also in conflict with the good design aims of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework).

STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT (REFUSALS): In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above.