| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed conversion of the property from a guest house into four additional residential units is considered to be an over-intense use of the property and the cumulative overall increase in residential density would be significantly detrimental to the character of the holiday area, together with the impact on the nearby accommodation and thereby be contrary to Policy TR12 and HOU23 of the Great Yarmouth Borough-Wide Local Plan. Furthermore, if permitted, the proposal would create an undesirable precedent for further similar sub-division of these terraced properties in the area with a resultant increase in residential density to the detriment of the character of the locality. |
| 2. | The use of the property as five residential dwellings is an over-intense use of the site which does not provide quality accommodation. The size and layout of the units are designed to provide maximum residential occupancy and not quality accommodation. Contrary to the NPPF the development as proposed would provide poor quality housing with no mix nor diversity provided. The high density use of the building would be detrimental to the character of the area and any potential future occupants. |
| 3. | No information to support the statement that the existing holiday use is not viable has been submitted nor has any supporting evidence to show that the business has not been run for a number of years. In the absence of supporting evidence, the over-intense use of the site to provide low quality accommodation and the detrimental effect that the loss of holiday accommodation would have on the character of the area is contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework and policies HOU23, HOU15 and TR12 of the Borough Wide Local Plan. |
| 4. | STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT (REFUSALS): In accordance with the NPPF, in determining this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, despite this, in this particular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable or an acceptable form of development and has been refused for the reasons set out above.
|
