| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | In the opinion of the local planning authority the proposed extension does not accord with crterion (i) of policy HOU18 of the adopted Great Yarmouth Borough Wide Local Plan, by virtue of the scale, proximity to boundaries and relationship to other dwellings it would have an unacceptable and detrimental impact on the amenities of adjacent occupants by way of visual dominance and overshadowing that is not in keeping with the existing dwelling or character of the area. |
| 2. | In addition the proposed extension is considered unacceptable and in particular the north-western gable adjacent the boundary with No.46 California Crescent would have a significant and visual impact which would have a detrimental impact on the visual amenities of adjacent residents and would be visually overbearing contrary to criterion (ii) of policy HOU18. |
| 3. | Therefore for the reasons given above the proposed extension, as submitted, is considered unacceptable as it does not accord with policy HOU18 of the adopted Great Yarmouth Borough Wide Local Plan. |
| 4. | STATEMENT OF POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT:- In determining this planning application the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achieve the aim of approving sustainable development. Unfortunately, in this particular case, the proposal is not considered to represent an acceptable form of development and has been been refused for the reasons given above. |
