Great Yarmouth Borough Council Portal
No.Condition Text
1.The proposal, which in effect, provides for an additional dwelling at the rear of Melbreak on Butt Lane, is contrary to criteria (A) and (E) of Policy HOU7 of the adopted Great Yarmouth Borough-Wide Local Plan. In respect of the former, it is considered that the proposal would be detrimental to the form, character and setting of the settlement, particularly as this area of Burgh Castle is mostly made up of frontage development comprising sizeable dwellings on relatively large plots. As regards the latter, the siting of the 'annexe' in close proximity to the western boundary of the site and in an elevated position in relation to the properties on Butt Lane, would have a detrimental effect on the amenities of adjoining residents by reason of the increased activity / disturbance generated by the development. The proposal is also considered to be contrary to Policy HOU17 in that it is tantamount to a subdivision of the site into two plots. The outbuilding, which is the subject of this application, is sited at some considerable distance from the main dwelling which makes it less capable of operation as an annexe. For this reason its use as an annexe is considered inappropriate, as it provides accommodation which is capable of being used as an independant planning unit, i.e. a new dwelling.
2.STATEMENT of Positive Engagement:In accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework, in determinatiing this application for planning permission, the Borough Council has approached it in a positive and proactive way and where possible has sought solutions to problems to achive the aim of approving sustainable development. Unforntunately, despite this, in this paricular case the development is not considered to represent sustainable development and has been refused for the reasons set out above.