| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed extensions because of the design, scale and form are considered by the Local Planning Authority to be inappropriate and insensitive additions to this Grade 2 listed building and one that would have an adverse impact upon the character of the building and its setting and is therefore contrary to Policy BNV5 of the Great Yarmouth Local Plan 2001 which only permits works to a listed building if they preserve the character and setting of the building. |
| 2. | The Local Planning Authority considers that the design, scale and form of proposed extensions and loss of trees will detract from and not enhance the character and special quality of the designated Conservation Area in which the building is located;the proposals are therefore contrary to Policies BNV9 and 10 of Great Yarmouth Borough Wide Local Plan 2001 which only supports new development in Conservation Areas which is sympathetic to the character or appearance of the area.
|
| 3. | The proposed rear extension would involve the removal of trees or adversely impact upon the roots of trees, subject to a Tree Preservation Order and which contribute substantially to the character and visual amenity of the area;Policy NNV23 of the Great Yarmouth Local Plan 2001 prohibits the removal of trees except in exceptional circumstances for good arboricultural reasons, none of which are relevant here, therefore the proposal is considered contrary to Policy NNV23.
|
| 4. | The Local Planning Authority considers that the building's curtilage is an intregral component of the listed building which, along with its historic links with St. Georges Park, is essential to the building and its setting,contributing to both the character of the building and that of the area.Policy BNV7 of the Great Yarmouth Borough Wide Local Plan 2001, seeks to protect the curtilages of listed buildings from development unless it can be shown to protect the building,its setting or the historic interest it possesses.The Local Planning Authority considers that the rear extension, along with the resultant impact upon the trees, will erode and infringe upon the unique character of the curtilage and its historic interest, along with the setting of the listed building by introducing development that complies with the stated policy and one that is quite out of keeping with the design of the building and character of the area and that the proposal is therefore contrary to Policy BNV7. |
| 5. | The proposed extensions because of the scale,form,design and location are considered by the Local Planning Authority to infringe upon the light and outlook of the nearby residential properties and harmful to the residential amenity and enjoyment of those properties;the proposal is therefore contrary to Policy HOU7 of the Great Yarmouth Borough Wide Local Plan 2001 which prohits development that permits development signicantly detrimental to the residential amenities of adjoining occupiers or users of land. |
