| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The application site is outside any area defined in the adopted Great Yarmouth Borough - Wide Local Plan where residential development might be permitted. Outside these defined areas Policy HOU10 of the plan only permits the erection of a new dwelling if it is required in connection with either agriculture, forestry, organised recreation or the expansion of an existing institution. In such cases it must be demonstrated that the new dwelling is essential in the interests of agriculture or good management and the proposal must have the unequivocal support of a suitably qualified independent appraisor. No evidence has been put forward in support of the application to satisfy the requirements of the policy the objective of which is to prevent unjustified development in the countryside. |
| 2. | In the areas around settlements shown on the Borough-wide Local Plan proposals maps as "landscape important to the setting of settlements",Policy NNV5 of the local plan states the council will only permit development provided a developer can demonstrate essential need or that the development would not impinge on the physical separation between settlements or give rise to any other significant adverse impact. In this instance the erection of a dwelling on the site proposed would only serve to consolidate the existing sporadic development in this area to the detriment of the rural character of this part of Belton. The proposal would thereby have a significant adverse impact on the area contary to Policy NNV5 of the Local Plan. |
| 3. | Policy TCM13 of the Great Yarmouth Borough-Wide Local Plan states that development will not be permitted where it would endanger highway safety or the satisfactory functioning of the Local Highway network. The site access is unsuitable to cater for any additional development whatsoever, by reason of its severely restricted visibility at its junction with the C603 - Beccles Road. The increased use of the access resulting from the proposed development would therefore create an unacceptable additional hazard to road users which would be contrary to the above mentioned policy. |
