Great Yarmouth Borough Council

No.	Condition Text
1.	Policy HOU18 of the Great Yarmouth Borough - Wide Local Plan states that extensions and alterations to dwellings will be permitted where the proposal : (a) is in keeping with the design of the existing dwelling and the character of the area (b) would not significantly affect the amenities of any neighbouring dwelling and (c) would not result in over - development of the site. In this instance the proposed rear extension, which would be right on the boundary with the attached terraced house No 18 Turin Way would be appear overbearing when viewed from and be likely to restrict light reaching the rear of this property. The proposed two storey side extension which would extend in front of the line of the existing garages and right to the boundary with the adjoining occupier's garage access would be likely to impair access to the adjoining occupier's garage. Under these circumstances it is considered that the proposed extension would cause significant detriment to the occupiers of the adjoining property and as such would be contrary to criterion (b) of the above mentioned policy.

No.

Condition Text

Policy HOU18 of the Great Yarmouth Borough - Wide Local Plan states that extensions and alterations to dwellings will be permitted where the proposal : (a) is in keeping with the design of the existing dwelling and the character of the area (b) would not significantly affect the amenities of any neighbouring dwelling and (c) would not result in over - development of the site. In this instance the proposed rear extension, which would be right on the boundary with the attached terraced house No 18 Turin Way would be appear overbearing when viewed from and be likely to restrict light reaching the rear of this property. The proposed two storey side extension which would extend in front of the line of the existing garages and right to the boundary with the adjoining occupier's garage access would be likely to impair access to the adjoining occupier's garage. Under these circumstances it is considered that the proposed extension would cause significant detriment to the occupiers of the adjoining property and as such would be contrary to criterion (b) of the above mentioned policy.