Great Yarmouth Borough Council

No.	Condition Text
1.	Policy HOU18 of the Great Yarmouth Borough - Wide Local Plan states that extensions and alterations to dwellings will be permitted where the proposal : (a) is in keeping with the design of the existing dwelling and the character of the area (b) would not significantly affect the amenities of any neighbouring dwelling and (c) would not result in over - development of the site. In this instance the proposed extension would be directly in front of the south facing kitchen window of No 55 Seaview Drive, the bungalow to the north of the application site, and being at a distance of less than 4 metres away would appear overbearing when viewed from and be likely to restrict light reaching this window. The impact of the extension on No 55 would be exacerbated by the fact that the ground level of the application site is about 0.6 metres higher than that of No 55. Under these circumstances it is considered that the proposed extension would cause significant detriment to the occupiers of the adjoining property and as such would be contrary to criterion (b) of the above mentioned policy.

No.

Condition Text

Policy HOU18 of the Great Yarmouth Borough - Wide Local Plan states that extensions and alterations to dwellings will be permitted where the proposal : (a) is in keeping with the design of the existing dwelling and the character of the area (b) would not significantly affect the amenities of any neighbouring dwelling and (c) would not result in over - development of the site. In this instance the proposed extension would be directly in front of the south facing kitchen window of No 55 Seaview Drive, the bungalow to the north of the application site, and being at a distance of less than 4 metres away would appear overbearing when viewed from and be likely to restrict light reaching this window. The impact of the extension on No 55 would be exacerbated by the fact that the ground level of the application site is about 0.6 metres higher than that of No 55. Under these circumstances it is considered that the proposed extension would cause significant detriment to the occupiers of the adjoining property and as such would be contrary to criterion (b) of the above mentioned policy.